Talk:Sponge
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sponge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Sponge has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 14, 2008. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization: |
Helicolocellus
[edit]As of writing this, the oldest known definitive sea sponge (to my knowledge) is Helicolocellus, a Late Ediacaran crown group sponge apparently related to Hexactinellida. Other early putative sponges have had their poriferan identity questioned, such as Otavia, which has had its sponge affinity and even biogenicity questioned by Antcliffe et al. 2014 (Giving the early fossil record of sponges a squeeze). This genus does not appear to be referenced in this article. Should it be? Tourmaline Ctenacanth (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I edited the article to include that and Arimasia. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Tonian
[edit]Add possible tonian record to sponges and other confirmed huanian animais Wirth their highest non-kingdom valid group. Like this: Animal-history-cryogenian to present-possible tonian record. 2001:1308:2798:6500:E05C:23CF:2C3A:968B (talk) 01:08, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't obvious that a "possible" record should be added to any timeline; that's for known reliably-attested records. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Probable then? 2001:1308:268B:D300:4039:FC80:320A:801E (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- This isn't a negotiation. The timelines in all taxon articles are meant to be based on solid scientific opinion, cited in the article, that's all. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:58, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Probable then? 2001:1308:268B:D300:4039:FC80:320A:801E (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class animal articles
- High-importance animal articles
- WikiProject Animals articles
- Spoken Wikipedia requests
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press